If you’ve been anywhere near a television set recently, you’ve seen it. From his perch on a garage wall, a fish sings a song that has become insanely infectious. “Give me back that Filet-o-Fish,” he sings to one sandwich-munching guy while his friend looks on. “If it were you in that sandwich, you wouldn’t be laughing at all,” the creature continues.

The new Filet-o-Fish commercial has been an explosive success for McDonald’s, who timed the ad to coincide with Lent, which accounts for 25% of their fish sandwich sales. If you’ve been lurking under a rock, you can view the ad on YouTube , but you won’t be alone. The clip has now been viewed over one million times. That’s one million people who have voluntarily watched an ad that McDonald’s doesn’t even have to pay to run.

There’s a certain genius to the commercial, which people seem to love or hate. Even the haters are not immune to the message, though, and still report having the song stuck in their heads days after hearing it. While the key to the success of the commercial is partly in the catchy hook of the song, it’s also in its absurdity. Would the song have been as noticed if it hadn’t been sung by a dead fish? It’s doubtful.

Another recent commercial that is currently enjoying success because it so easily sticks in consumers’ heads is the Subway “Five Dollar Footlongs” campaign. In the case of Subway’s campaign, though, there’s something slightly different at work. The song is catchy (though not absurd like a singing fish), and the price cut is also a selling point, but neither factor alone would be good enough to boost sales like this campaign has.

The magic is in the message. Subway didn’t take out ads that announce “For a limited time only, Subway is helping you through the recession by selling all of their tasty footlong sandwiches for only five dollars.” If they had, not nearly as many people would have noticed. The brilliance behind the Subway campaign is in the simplicity of the words: five dollar footlongs. What does Subway have? Five dollar footlongs.

Burger King has a commercial in current rotation that features women with box-shaped rear ends dancing to “Baby’s Got Back,” but with the words “square butts” subbed for “big butts.” It’s almost a shocker on the first viewing, and it’s doubtful that it’s going to become the next stuck-in-your-head sensation. It works fantastically, though, on its first viewing, when the watcher thinks “What the…?” Then, after learning that Burger King is packaging Spongebob Squarepants toys with its meals, all becomes clear.

While each of these commercials is vastly different, they all have something in common that can be an important lesson for those in creative fields. The shared component is: they would all sound stupid on paper. Think about it.

Would you have the guts to propose an ad with a dead fish singing to two silent actors to stop eating him? If a client asked you for some fresh copy for a new sandwich promotion, would you think “Five dollar footlongs” was too simple and instead turn in some overwrought text? And would you ever in a million years have the creative bravery to suggest box-shaped butts?

There’s always a temptation to appeal to the mainstream that is so great that we tend to pitch variations on the same theme again and again. But, what these ads prove is that risk-taking pays off much more than playing it safe. The mainstream is unpredictable. Do you have the guts to pitch against the stream? You’ve got more on the inside than that taxidermized fish has. Use it!

by Elizabeth Kelly

What are the strangest ads you’ve seen that actually worked? Share your thoughts with Oozil.

This entry was posted on Monday, April 20th, 2009 at 12:22 pm and is filed under Advertising Case Studies, Copywriting. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response